Three Corporations run the world

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City

World events most of which are ‘engineered’ leave a trail that leads to the architects. We next discover that there are 3 cities on earth that come under no national authority, they have separate laws, they pay no taxes, they have their own police force and even possess their own flag of ‘independence’. These 3 cities control the economy, military onslaughts and the spiritual beings of those in powers. The 3 cities are actually corporations and they are the City of London, District of Columbia and the Vatican. Together they control politicians, the courts, educational institutions, food supply, natural resources, foreign policies, economies, media, and the money flow of most nations as well as 80% of the world’s entire wealth. Their ultimate aim is to build a totalitarian rule on a global scale where people will be divided into rulers and the ruled after they have depopulated the world to numbers they wish to rule over. What we need to understand is that the world does not work according to what we have been led to believe. We are drowning in misinformation.

At the center of each city state are giant phallic shaped stone monuments called obelisks.

London obelisk (aka Cleopatra’s Needle): Located on the banks of the River Thames, this obelisk was transported to London and erected in 1878 under the reign of Queen Victoria. The obelisk originally stood in the Egyptian city of On, or Heliopolis (the City of the Sun). The Knights Templars’ land extended to this area of the Thames, where the Templars had their own docks. Either side of the obelisk is surrounded by a sphinx, more symbolism dating back to the ancient world.

In D.C. the obelisk is known as the Washington monument was dedicated to George Washington by the secretive brotherhood of Freemason Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia in 1848. They also contributed 22 masonic memorial stones. 250 masonic lodges financed the Washington monument obelisk including the knights templar masonic order.

Vatican obelisk: Located in St. Peter’s Square, was moved from Egypt to its current location, in 1586. The circle on the ground represents the female vagina, while the obelisk itself is the penis. This is commonly known as occult symbolism.

The Roman Empire prevails through the :

1. CITY OF LONDON INC 

The City of London was formed when the Romans arrived in Great Britain 2000 years ago and started a trading post on the River Thames. Exactly 1000 years later William the Conqueror (King William III) gave sovereign status to the City of Londoners in 1694 allowing them to continue enjoying separate rights and privileges so long as they recognized him as King. The Kings that succeeded William however, decided to build a new capital city and named it Westminster. There have been numerous instances of the King and the City’s Mayor at loggerheads with each other.

What is peculiar is that laws passed by the British Parliament does not apply to the City of London. 

However the City of London is not an independent nation like the Vatican.

Today the City of London is a one-square mile city. The 2 Londons have separate city halls and elect separate mayors, who collect separate taxes to fund separate police who enforce separate laws. City of London has its own separate flag and crest while London city does not. The Mayor of the City of London has a fancy title ‘The Right Honourable the Lord Mayor of London’ and rides a golden carriage to Guildhall while the Mayor of London wears a suit and takes a bus. The Mayor of London has no power over the Right Honorable Lord Mayor of London (City of London). What’s unique is that the City of London is a Corporation and older than the United Kingdom but has a representative in the UK Parliament through a person known as the ‘Remembrancer’ who is present to protect the ‘City’s interests.

The City of London houses

Rothschild controlled ‘Bank of England’

Lloyds of London

The London Stock Exchange

All British Banks

The Branch offices of 384 Foreign Banks

70 USA Banks

Fleet Streets Newspaper and Publishing Monopolies

Headquarters for Worldwide Freemasonry

Headquarters for the worldwide money cartel known as ‘THE CROWN’

The City of London is controlled by the Bank of England, a private corporation owned by the Rothschild family after Nathan Rothschild crashed the English stock market in 1812 and took control of the Bank of England.

The Queen refers to the City of London Corporation as the ‘Firm’ but it is known as The CROWN (not representing the Royalty of Britain). Buckingham Palace is in London but not in the City of London and the City is not part of England.

City of London directly and indirectly controls all mayors, councils, regional councils, multi-national and trans-national banks, corporations, judicial systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal Courts of Justice in London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank (through N. M. Rothschild & Sons London Italian subsidiary Torlonia), European Central Bank, United States Federal Reserve (which is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland (which is also British-controlled and oversees all of the Reserve Banks around the world including our own) and the European Union and the United Nations Organization. The Crown controls the global financial system and runs the governments of all Commonwealth countries, and many non-Commonwealth ‘Western’ nations as well (like Greece). The Crown traces back to the Vatican, which is headed by the Pope (who owns American Express) In essence the City of London Corporation would become the “One World Earth Corporation” and would privately own the world. 

2. Washington DC (District of Colombia)

Washington DC is not part of the USA. District of Columbia is located on 10sq miles of land. DC has its own flag and own independent constitution. This constitution operates under a tyrannical Roman law known as Lex Fori. DC constitution has nothing to do with the American Constitution. The Act of 1871 passed by Congress created a separate corporation known as THE UNITED STATES & corporate government for the District of Columbia. Thus DC acts as a Corporation through the Act. The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars (the 3 stars denoting DC, Vatican City and City of London).

A look at the various Treaties raises the question of whether US remains a British Crown colony. The basis of this goes back to the first Charter of Virginia in 1606 that granted Britain the right to colonize America and gave the British King/Queen to hold sovereign authority over colonized America and its citizens. Colonized America was created after stealing America from the Native Indians. If America was colonized with British subjects these people are subjects of the British Government.

To negate this was the Treaty of 1783 declaring independence from Great Britain. However, this Treaty identifies the King/Queen of England as the Prince of the United States. (please refer www.treatyofparis.com) Nevertheless, according to the Bouviers Law dictionary in ‘monarchicial governments’ a subject owes permanent allegiance to the monarch in which case the British subjects in colonized America owed permanent allegiance to the monarch.

The reverse is applicable under Constitutional law where allegiance is owed to the sovereign and to the laws of a sovereign government and natives are both subjects and citizens.

The issue is if a war was fought in 1781 and America became victor why would Britain need to sign a Treaty in 1783? When US has won a war, America should not require the British monarch to cede land and refer to himself as Prince of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States? There is also the issue of the use of the term ‘Esquire’ given that it is a title of nobility again showing allegiance to the Queen/King and when Benjamin Franklin, John Jay Esquire and John Adams signing on behalf of the US use the name ‘Esquire’ it is raising the question of how valid the 1783 Treaty is. John Jay went on to sign the 1794 Treaty between England and US raising again why 13 years after the Paris Treaty the US needs to sign a Treaty with England if US was really ‘independent’.

What needs to be further investigated is why US still continues to pay tax to the City if it is a free nation?

The 1794 Treaty signed between England and the US was negotiated by John Jay Esquire who negotiated the 1783 Treaty. The question is why would US need to sign Treaty’s with England 13 years after the Paris Treaty of 1783 declaring US independent? Why would Article 6 and Article 12 continue to dictate terms to an ‘independent’ America?

Further reading of US history would reveal what happened to America when it cancelled the Charter of the First National Bank in 1811 and immediately afterwards 4500 British troops arrived and burnt down the White House, both Houses of Congress, the War Office, the US State Department and Treasury and destroyed the ratification records (signed by 12 US states) of the US Constitution wherein the 13thAmendment was to stop anyone receiving a Title of nobility or honor from serving the US Government. The 1812 war lasted 3 years and the Bank Charter was re-established in 1816 after the ratification of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815. Note: 13th amendment which was ratified in 1810 no longer appears in current copies of the U.S. constitution.

In 1913 the Federal Reserve was passed by US Congress handing over America’s gold and silver reserves and total control of America’s economy to the Rothschild banksters. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned banking system that does not belong to America or Americans.

It is no better a time to question whether US is a country or a corporation and the US President and officials at the Congress are working for that Corporation and not for the American people. It appears that the US Corporation is owned by the same country that owns Canada, Australia and New Zealand whose leaders are all serving the Queen in her Crown Land and US too has been and remains a crown colony that belong to the Empire of the 3 City States – City of London, Vatican City and Washington DC. The US president is nothing more than a figurehead for the central bankers and the transnational corporations – both of which are controlled by High Ecclesiastic Freemasonry from the City of London the home of the global financial system.

3. Vatican City

The Vatican City is not part of Italy or Rome. The Vatican is the last true remnant of the Roman Empire. The State of Israel is also said to be a Roman outpost. The Vatican’s wealth includes investments with the Rothschilds in Britain, France and US and with oil and weapons corporations as well. The Vatican’s billions are said to be in Rothschild controlled ‘Bank of England’ and US Federal Reserve Bank. The money possessed by the Vatican is more than banks, corporations or even some Governments and questions why the wealth is not used to elevate at least the Christian poor when it preaches about giving?

Vatican wealth has been accumulated over the centuries by taxing indulgences, some Popes have sold tickets to heaven. Today, they are harvesting souls in Asia as a 3rdmillennium goal.

Together the 3 Cities have under their wing various societies and groups placed globally with their own so that no one contests their global plan and those that do …well all the assassinations will explain what happens.

The Fabian Society is one such entity which written in 1887 is a mixture of fascism, Nazism, Marxism and communism. It is not hard to now imagine that all these ‘ideologies’ would have also been engineered by the same people. It should come as no surprise then to discover that the Fabian Society is accredited with creating Communist China, Fascism in Italy and Germany and Socialism globally as well. How far people have been fooled and also explains the role played by the Fabian Society in formulating policies for the decolonized British Empire. It would also mean that quite a number of British educated natives given the mantle of leading the newly independent nations would have also been members of the Fabian society. The communist takeover of Russia too is said to be the work of the British Fabian Society financed by the City of London banking families.

A closer look at entities like the Bank Of International Settlements (BIS), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Club Of Rome, The Committee Of 300, the Central ‘Intelligence’ Agency (CIA), the Council On Foreign Relations, The Tri-Lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Groups, the ‘Federal’ Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service(s), Goldman Sachs, Israel and the Israeli lobby, the Vatican, the City of London, Brussels, the United Nations, the Israeli Mossad, and Associated Press (AP) will reveal that they are all part of the Fabian Society which also controls the European Union.

A noteworthy quote is that of Australian Senator Chris Schacht who said in 2001 “You probably were not aware that us Fabians have taken over the CIA, KGB, M15, ASIO (Australian Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the World Bank and many other organizations.”

From all this we should realize that NOTHING HAPPENS IN ISOLATION. Therefore, every event however small is engineered and orchestrated by a handful of people who control the world and what goes on in the world.

Together they have been responsible for

1. Global Warming/Climate change – by creating an environmental catastrophe and winning the Nobel Prize, they have created a public awareness for a ‘global government’ that gives them the right to take action over national governments. Known as UN Agenda 21 a closer look at its clauses will reveal how people will need to get permission for everything they do – in other words it is being used to control people.

2. Federal Banking system – The Fabian Society created the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 handing over the US economy to a cartel of international financiers.

3. Big Pharma – is responsible for drugging the Third World

4. System of local government – promoting devolution and new concept of regional councils in a bid to increase a revenue generating system. It is within an overall plan to abolish independent sovereign national governments. Britain is divided in 9 separate regions of the EU. The British will be shocked to discover that EU laws take precedence over British laws and if they have doubts they need to ask why the Queen and British PMs have signed Treaties handing over power.

5. Abolition of property rights – in 1974 at the Habitat Conference private property was identified as a threat to peace and equality of the environment. Using ‘environmentalism’ as a ploy the quest was to take over earth’s resources and place it under a central authority (UN) and issue licenses for payment. Who owns the UN…the same banking families. In 1987 the World Wilderness Congress was held organized by the Rothschild’s World Conservation Bank which was set up the same year. The World Bank is likely to be replaced by the World Conservation Bank – the aim is to break down national banks and assets will also be diverted to the new bank which is why there is an aim to merge currencies into 2 or 3 major currency groups and replace them with a new electronic currency which is said to be called the ‘earth dollar’. New Zealand has apparently transferred over 34% of its land area into UN Heritage Areas and Conservation Parks and these will all be owned by the same banking families. In 1992 the UN Conference on Environment and Development in Brazil was chaired by Mikhail Gorbachev responsible for dividing the Soviet Union and Maurice Strong, the Rothschild London agent. The topic was Agenda 21 which gave man rights superior to animals, fish, plants, trees and forests.

6. The Patriots Act, the Human Rights Bill, the European Union Constitution, the Security and Prosperity Partnership are all being manipulated to place power in the control of a few hands. Their plans are plotted annually through the Bilderberg Group and their agents run numerous think tanks that steer Government policy which are funded by the banksters who in real terms run the world. Thus the 13 banking families that run the world control the central banks of the world that print money, give loans on interest and explains how national debt never decreases. Economic crises, oil crisis (simply to increase prices), Arab Springs are all manufactured as are wars. There is a saying that all wars and bankers wars. The danger is when it comes to food as the control is being placed under Monsanto and GMOs. Monsanto is the same company that introduced Agent Orange therefore it is worthwhile reading UN’s Codex Alimentarius and the impeding dangers.

An article by John Christian on THE BANKSTER’S ‘WORLD CONSERVATION BANK’and their electronic global currency, the ‘Earth Dollar’ is worth while reading.

anticorruptionsociety.com

Please read up on the items mentioned and expand your own understanding.

Shenali D Waduge

Christ Superior Priesthood

Christ Superior Priesthood

Pastor John Miller continues our survey through the book of Hebrews with a message titled “Christ Superior Priesthood ” through Hebrews 7:1-28.

Pastor Photo

Pastor John Miller

March 29, 2023

7:1 For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him, 2 to whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all, first being translated "king of righteousness," and then also king of Salem, meaning "king of peace," 3 without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, remains a priest continually. 4 Now consider how great this man was, to whom even the patriarch Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils. 5 And indeed those who are of the sons of Levi, who receive the priesthood, have a commandment to receive tithes from the people according to the law, that is, from their brethren, though they have come from the loins of Abraham; 6 but he whose genealogy is not derived from them received tithes from Abraham and blessed him who had the promises. 7 Now beyond all contradiction the lesser is blessed by the better. 8 Here mortal men receive tithes, but there he receives them, of whom it is witnessed that he lives. 9 Even Levi, who receives tithes, paid tithes through Abraham, so to speak, 10 for he was still in the loins of his father when Melchizedek met him. 11 Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there is also a change of the law. 13 For He of whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no man has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And it is yet far more evident if, in the likeness of Melchizedek, there arises another priest 16 who has come, not according to the law of a fleshly commandment, but according to the power of an endless life. 17 For He testifies: "You are a priest forever According to the order of Melchizedek." 18 For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness, 19 for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. 20 And inasmuch as He was not made priest without an oath 21 (for they have become priests without an oath, but He with an oath by Him who said to Him: "The Lord has sworn And will not relent, 'You are a priest forever According to the order of Melchizedek' "), 22 by so much more Jesus has become a surety of a better covenant. 23 Also there were many priests, because they were prevented by death from continuing. 24 But He, because He continues forever, has an unchangeable priesthood. 25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. 26 For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens; 27 who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people's, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself. 28 For the law appoints as high priests men who have weakness, but the word of the oath, which came after the law, appoints the Son who has been perfected forever.

Again, every week I kind of give a little introduction, which is almost identical every week. The book of Hebrews is written to Jewish believers in Christ who were getting persecuted, facing opposition and difficulty, and thus growing discouraged, wanting to turn back to Judaism. They were going to abandon Christianity and Christ to go back to Judaism. The Bible in the book of Hebrews does two things, the writer of Hebrews tells them that we have a better covenant—we have a better priest, we have a better sacrifice, we have a better way by faith to approach God through Christ—and that we should not turn back and be discouraged. He’s instructing them as to the superiority of Christ over the old covenant and Judaism, and he’s also encouraging them with a warning exhortation passage to not be discouraged, not to go back, but to move ahead. The Jews would actually face a lot of opposition for faith in Christ, and they would also get discouraged thinking, Well, maybe we don’t have a priest anymore. We don’t have access to God anymore. We don’t have a temple or a tabernacle anymore, so they were wanting to go back to their old religious system rather than going forward with Christ.

There are also some other subtle inferences in the book of Hebrews; that is, Christianity is the completion of biblical Judaism, that Judaism has passed off the scene and Christ has come on the scene; Jesus is the Messiah, He’s the Jewish Messiah, He’s come to bring the new covenant to establish His church where Jew and Gentile become one in Christ. It’s the passing away of the old and the pressing forward of the new.

In different ways a lot of times Christians will have the same experience if they come maybe from a Roman Catholic background especially, and come to know Christ personally and are born again. They struggle with leaving Roman Catholicism, its traditions, rites and rituals, to come to Protestantism and to just simply have the Bible, the Word of God, and following Christ. Sometimes they want to go back to the priest, to the confession, to the Eucharist, to the different sacraments and some of the things that they were indoctrinated in, and it’s understandable. It’s hard for them to leave that. In many ways that’s a secondary application, but it’s nevertheless a fitting application that many times people are unwilling to give up that which they were raised in to follow Christ and follow the truth that is in simplicity in His Word.

We got the reference to Melchizedek several times in the book of Hebrews, but now he finally comes to Hebrews 7. Hebrews 7 is where the writer jumps in with both feet, so to speak, and deals with the subject of Melchizedek. Go back with me to Hebrews 6:20 where we ended that third exhortation section where he says, “Whither the forerunner is for us entered,” he’s referring to Christ who has gone before to heaven for us, “even Jesus, made,” and here it is, “an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.” Now he jumps in and starts to break down who is this Melchizedek.

I want to outline this study tonight for you. We’re going to take three approaches in looking at Melchizedek. We’re going to first of all look at him being typical, or a type or a picture, of Jesus Christ, verses 1-10. Melchizedek is positionally better than Abraham and Levi. If you’re taking notes, there are basically three books of the Bible where Melchizedek is referred to. The first is Genesis 14:18-20 in the historical setting. This is history. The second is Psalm 110:4 where it is prophetic with a Messianic prophecy. It predicts the coming of Melchizedek and that Jesus would be, “an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec,” we have it quoted in our text tonight. The third is in Hebrews 7, mentioned in Hebrews 6 as well but really dealt with in Hebrews 7, which is a doctrinal section. Let me point this out: In Genesis, we have the history; in Psalm 110, we have the prophecy; and in Hebrews 7, we have the doctrinal explanation of the prophetic word given in Psalm 110. Psalm 110:4 is one of the key prophetic Messianic prophecies about Jesus our High Priest who comes after the order of Melchizedek.

We see, first of all, in verses 1-3 that His person and His titles are superior to the Levitical system. Notice in Hebrews 7:1, “For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; 2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace,” notice verse 3, “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; made,” and I’ve circled the word “like,” “like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.” We see in these first ten verses that we’re going to see Christ is better than the Levitical system or the priesthood of Aaron, that He’s after the order of Melchizedek.

First of all we see his names and his titles. He’s Melchizedek, which is king of righteousness. He’s also called a king, verse 1, and priest. Notice those two designations: king and priest. Any Jew’s ears would perk up when he would hear those references because to the Jews you don’t have a king who can be a priest—you’re either a priest or a king. In the Old Testament there was no intermingling of those two offices. Anytime a king of Israel tried to venture into the priesthood, he was judged by God, so there was no intermingling. These offices weren’t mingled together.

Jesus Christ is not only a Priest and a King, He’s a Prophet. Actually, when you’re doing a study of the nature and the person of Christ, which we just did last Sunday morning, He has those three offices: He’s Prophet, He’s a Priest, and He’s King. We know He’s the Son of God, and we talked about what’s called the hypostatic union, the two natures in the One Person, Jesus Christ. He’s also a Prophet, He represents God to man and man to God, He speaks the Word of God; and He’s also a Priest, He’s the One who bridges the gap between man and God; and He’s also a King, He’s the King of David, He’s the coming King who will sit on the throne of David in the Millennium and reign for a thousand years, and we know Him also as the King of kings and the Lord of lords.

Here, we have a reference to Melchizedek who is called, “king of Salem,” which is, by the way, peace, but it’s also a reference to Jerusalem. He was actually king of Jerusalem there all the way back long before David captured Jerusalem and made it the capital of the nation. He was a mysterious fellow that came out from the city of Jerusalem and blessed Abraham and whom Abraham paid tithes to. His name is “king” and “priest,” Melchizedek.

Notice he’s the, “…priest of the most high God,” which in the Hebrew isʾĒl ʿElyōn. Verse 1, “who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him,” then “…Abraham gave a tenth,” or a tithe of all that he got in the battle. Now, just write it down and go to it when you get a chance, Genesis 14:18-20, because that’s what it’s describing there in verses 1-2 when he, “…met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him.” Abraham had gone down to rescue his nephew Lot from these four kings that had taken him captive and taken all his stuff. Abraham conquered these four kings, took the loot, and was coming back from the battle. When he was coming back from the battle, this man, Melchizedek, comes out of the city of Jerusalem and brings with him, it says in Genesis, wine and bread. Some see this as a prefigure of communion that he had with Abraham. Then, Abraham does something very interesting. He takes of the spoils of the battle that he just had and gives ten percent to Melchizedek. The phrase in the Greek, “a tenth part,” literally means the top part; so out of the very top of the pile, he takes this ten percent and gives it to Melchizedek, and Melchizedek blesses Abraham. That’s the historical narrative, and the writer of Hebrews breaks it down for us and gives us an understanding and the explanation of what it means.

Notice verse 2. It says, “To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation,” again, now we have a reference to his titles, “King of righteousness, and…King of Salem.” He’s called, “…king of Salem,” and “priest of the most high God,” now he’s called, “…King of righteousness, and…King of Salem, which is, King of peace.” Just to kind of spill the beans, because I need to kind of get there to make it all kind of make sense, I believe that Melchizedek is what’s called a type of Jesus Christ. I don’t believe that he is a theophany or an appearance of Christ in the Old Testament, but I do believe that he is a normal man that is a picture or what we Bible students would call a type. The word is túpos. It was used of if you made an impression on a piece of metal or clay, and whatever you made the impression with left an image or picture there. It’s an impression or image that’s made.

In the Old Testament we have what’s called typology, and the typology is actually where God uses a person or a situation in the Old Testament to prefigure or picture something that will happen in the New Testament, but it has to have divine design in it. A lot of Bible students make a big mistake in that they look in the Old Testament and every time they read a story they find some typology, “There’s Jesus there. This means this, this means that,” and they take the historical narrative and read into it typology that God never intended there to be. You say, “Well, how do you know that?” Let me give you a rule of thumb in interpreting typology: You must have clear New Testament reference that that Old Testament person, place, or thing is intended by God to be a type. If you don’t, then you are imposing your ideas on the text, and what happens is you become the authority.

Now, whenever I’ve taught at Bible college, and I’ve taught classes on hermeneutics, which is the science and art of interpreting Scripture, this has always been an important point, that a type is a type when God designates it as a type in the New Testament. For us to be sure it’s a type, the New Testament has to say it’s a type. Now, the Scriptures here do not use a reference to it being a túpos or a type, but it is clearly being taught in the book of Hebrews that Melchizedek at least pictures or represents Jesus Christ. There are some situations where we may not be absolutely sure if it’s intended to be a classic type, but this is a case where the New Testament does make clear that Melchizedek is a picture or type of Christ representing him as a “priest of the most high God,” and being a king and a different order of high priest that Jesus follows in because the Jew would actually say, “How could Jesus be our High Priest when He’s from the tribe of Judah?” The priesthood was from the tribe of Levi, so you’ve got a problem here. He had to be from the tribe of Judah to be the King, the Messiah, and you had to be from the tribe of Levi to be a priest. So, He skips over the Levitical order (and we’re going to see that in this chapter) and He’s a priest after a different order, that’s the order of Melchizedek. It’s very important to understand that, but I do believe that he’s a person that is a type or picture.

Now, we could go into a whole study of typology, but you remember in John 3 where Nicodemus came to Jesus and Jesus told him, “You must be born again,” and He was dialoguing with Nicodemus. Nicodemus says, “How can I, when I am old, enter into my mother’s womb and be born again a second time?” Jesus said, “And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up.” Jesus actually said that the story of Moses, making that serpent of brass, putting it on a pole, lifting it up in the congregation and when they looked at that serpent of brass on the pole, they would be healed from the bite of the snake, that that was a picture of Christ who would be lifted up on the cross. This is when He said, “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.” That’s a picture or that’s a type of Jesus Christ. It’s made clear there from John 3, when Jesus interacted there with Nicodemus.

Here we have this man Melchizedek, he’s called, “king of Salem, priest of the most high God,” and “…King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace.” Notice the two references: one to righteousness, verse 2, “King of righteousness,” and “King of peace,” he was “King of Salem,” in that he is a picture or a type of Jesus Christ. What a fitting picture that is. Jesus comes to die on the cross to impart His righteousness to us. He took our sin on the cross and gives us His righteousness. This is what’s called Him being a substitution for our sins, He died for our sins, and then imputation, He gives us His righteousness. When we put our faith and trust in Jesus Christ, He gives to us His righteousness.

It’s kind of like being bankrupt and you have no money in the bank, and someone deposits money in the bank for you—which would be kind of a cool thing, right? Someone calls you up and says, “Hey, I want to put a bunch of money in your bank account,” praise be Jehovah! They drop a bunch of money in your bank account and you go from being poverty-stricken to being rich. We’re poverty-stricken before God—we’re sinners, we’re beggars, we have nothing by which we can commend ourselves to God—but God takes the righteousness of Christ and He deposits it in our account. This is the believer’s positional righteousness, and then Jesus died on the cross to bring us peace with God, to bring us back to a relationship with the Father.

In Psalm 85:10 it says, “…righteousness and peace have kissed each other.” Many see that again as a Messianic prophecy that in the cross of Christ, righteousness and peace kiss one another. We have the righteousness of God, and we become right with God being justified, and we have peace with God through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. So Jesus is our righteousness, Jesus is our peace, and He brings us peace with God.

The thing that troubles people about this Melchizedek is that he’s, verse 3, “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.” This is where a lot of people assume that it’s describing Melchizedek as being a Christophany. When I use that word “Christophany,” what that means technically is that Jesus appears in the Old Testament as an individual or as the Angel of the Lord. It’s an appearance where Christ comes down, not in an incarnation, but He comes down and manifests Himself in the Old Testament because it describes this man Melchizedek of having no father, “…without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life,” so they think that this is a reference to him being an appearance of Christ in the Old Testament. I believe that this reference here is the simple way of saying that there’s no recording of his genealogy—no record of his birth, no record of his parentage, no record of his death—so it pictures and typifies the fact that he’s a type of Jesus Christ. All it really means is that he has no record of his parents or of his birth.

Normally, when a person appears in the narrative of the Old Testament, especially a key individual, it will mention his father and mother, or his father, or his tribe, or something about his parentage, you maybe give a little genealogy, and then of course you would think it would mention when he was born or when he died, but none of that is mentioned in the book of Genesis. This is why he’s so mysterious because there’s no recorded genealogy—there’s no record of his birth, his death—but what that means is that it’s a consistent picture or type of Jesus Christ who is eternal. Again, we studied this Sunday morning, and the first point we made about Jesus Christ is that He’s pre-existent and eternal, right? He’s God, so this is a picture of what Melchizedek portrayed that Jesus Christ is eternal and He was pre-existent. It says, “…made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually,” Jesus Christ, who is our King and who is our Priest.

When Abraham was met by him, and we’ll develop this more in just a minute, remember he paid tithes to Melchizedek. Melchizedek blessed Abraham. We’re going to see two things that Levi was actually considered still in the loins of Abraham. What do we mean? We mean that years later down the road from Abraham’s lineage, Levi would come. When Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek, it’s an indication that Melchizedek was superior not only to Abraham but to Levi who is still in his loins. That’s the picture there.

It also has a different picture. It means that Melchizedek brings a blessing to Abraham, that, “the less is blessed of the better.” What he’s masterfully doing is arguing that Melchizedek is superior to Abraham from which Levi came thus Jesus after Melchizedek is superior to that of Levi, and that’ll be developed in the text as we move through the passage.

Beginning in verse 4, down to verse 10, we see that he’s superior in his position in that he paid tithes. Notice it says, “Now consider how great this man was, unto whom even the patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils,” so he mentions him in the first three verses, now he says, “Consider him.” The word “consider” means to think down upon, to actually concentrate, and some of you say, “I’m trying my best right now, but I’m already thinking I should’ve stayed home and watched tv tonight because I have no idea what you’re talking about.” This is why the verse says, verse 4, “Now consider,” think and consider, “how great this man was.” Again, notice he’s called a man. It would seem kind of bizarre if Melchizedek were a theophany, an appearance of God, or a Christophany, an appearance of Christ, for Christ to be after the order of Melchizedek. It would be like Christ being after the order of Himself, so I do believe that he is, as it says in verse 4, a man.

Years ago, the great Dr. Walter Martin used to always point this out in verse 4, that Melchizedek is not a theophany or Christophany but a man, as he’s referred to here in Hebrews 7:4. So, think about, “how great this man was, unto whom even the patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils.” Again, the ears of a Jew would perk up, “Abraham? Somebody greater than Abraham? Who can be greater than Abraham? Abraham is the greatest. He’s the first Jew called by God. How can he be better than Abraham?” I don’t know, but he is, and it’s marvelous to look at this. It actually says, “And verily they that are of the sons of Levi, who receive the office of the priesthood, have a commandment to take tithes of the people according to the law.” Now he starts breaking it down. The people who are priests from the tribe of Levi, the Bible commands them to take tithes. He’s quoting a reference to Numbers 18:21 where they’re instructed as the Levites, “to take tithes of the people…that is, of their brethren, though they come out of the loins of Abraham.” The law required the priests to take tithes of their brethren even though they came from Abraham.

Verse 6, “But he whose descent is not counted from them received tithes of Abraham,” referring to Melchizedek, “and blessed him,” that is, Abraham, “that had the promises.” So, Melchizedek is blessing Abraham, verse 7, “And without all contradiction the less,” here’s the point, “is blessed of the better.” This is an argument of the lesser to the greater. The blessing of Melchizedek to Abraham means that Melchizedek is superior to Abraham because, “the less is blessed of the better.” Notice verse 8, “And here men that die” referring to the Levitical priests, “receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he liveth.” The priests from Levi would grow old and die, they’d have to be replaced; but this Melchizedek, because he’s without genealogical record like Christ, is referred to as living forever. That’s one of the qualities of his priesthood.

Verse 9, “And as I may so say, Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham.” Then, notice the explanation, verse 10, “For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.” This all may seem kind of strange to our western minds, but it’s something that in the eastern mind was very clear and understandable. In the New Testament, the same concept is used when we think of Adam sinning and acting as a federal head and bringing sin and death upon the entire human race. Do you know when Adam sinned, in Adam’s fall, we fell all. We were in Adam. Everyone came from Adam and Eve. Did you ever think about how crazy that is? Every human being came from Adam and Eve, then, of course, Noah was saved and his family, but it can all be traced back to two individuals. The Bible doesn’t teach evolution. We all came from God’s created individuals, Adam and Eve, in the Garden of Eden, and Adam’s sin brought condemnation and death upon the entire human race. We were in Adam’s loins, and we were actually considered sinners because of that.

Now, we begin to consider Melchizedek, verses 11-22, from a legal standpoint, from the law versus the new covenant of God’s grace. Jesus, our High Priest, brings the new system, not after the Mosaic law and Levitical priesthood, that is now being set aside. Notice the prediction of change in verses 11-17. “If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood,” if you could be perfected through the Levitical priesthood, “(for under it the people received the law,)” then the question is asked, “what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?” If there was going to be a fulfillment of the perfection through the Levitical priesthood, why would you have to have another order after Melchizedek and not just consider with the priesthood after Aaron questioned, verse 11? And, that’s a good question. Why would God prophetically, Psalm 110:4, prophesy a new order that would come after Melchizedek if there was no need for that?

Verse 12, “For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.” There’s going to be a change as he describes—the old is going to pass away, Christ is going to bring the new—and he’s telling them not to go back. Beginning in verses 13-17, he is the new priest. “For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe,” he’s quick to point out to the Jews that yes, he’s from the tribe of Judah, not from the tribe of Levi, “of which no man gave attendance at the altar,” he recognizes that. “For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,” he recognizes that he’s from Judah, no priest from Judah, yet God spoke in Melchizedek another order that would come on the scene.

Notice verses 16-17, “Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment,” which is the Levitical priesthood, “but after the power of an endless life.” He’s talking about the fact that Christ is a whole new priesthood and has an eternal priesthood, “…endless life,” not after the law but after Melchizedek who is an eternal priest. Verse 17, “For he testifieth,” and here’s the quote from prophecy, quoting Psalm 110:4, “Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec,” so not after Levi but after Melchizedek. Notice, “…for ever,” and the reference to the new order, “after the order of Melchisedec,” so the prophecy would be fulfilled in Christ.

We begin in verse 18, down to verse 22, to see the fact of that change. He says, “For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.” What he’s saying is that the old covenant with the Levitical priesthood and the ceremonial law—listen carefully—not the moral law, would actually be disannulled or passed off or put aside and that Christ would come in as a new Priest bringing in grace. John, in his gospel, said, “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” A lot of Christians today want to go back to legalism rather than following Christ and living in the grace of God, so we don’t want to do that.

Notice the commandment that’s set aside, verse 18. This is not the law that’s moral that God gave, but it’s the ceremonial law that is set aside. The law is powerless to save anyone, the Bible is very clear. Notice verse 19, “For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.” This is the theme all the way through the New Testament. We’re not saved by works, we’re not saved by law, we’re not saved by the Old Testament covenant keeping, we’re saved by grace. Even Abraham was saved by believing God, and God imputed righteousness to him through his faith, so “the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did,” which is the new covenant, the grace of God, Christ our High Priest, “by the which we draw nigh unto God.” Again, that theme in the book of Hebrews: Let us draw near, let us come with a full assurance into the holy of holies through our High Priest, Jesus Christ.

It says in verse 20, we see the new covenant is sure. So, the commandments are set aside, verse 18; the new hope brings perfection, verse 19; and then verses 20-22, we have a new covenant that is sure. “And inasmuch as not without an oath he was made priest,” so he was made a priest with an oath, “(For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath,” so the Old Testament priests weren’t made with an oath by God, but Melchizedek and Christ were sworn to be priests forever. “…The Lord sware and will not repent,” notice verse 21 again, “Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec),” the King of righteousness. He’s quoting Psalm 110:4. Verse 22, “By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament,” or covenant. Again, he’s just reminding them that this new priest is a better order, better covenant, and we can be perfected by Him, not under law but under the grace of God.

From verses 23, down to 28, which is the end of the chapter, we look at Melchizedek practically. We see him typically, we see him practically revealed here in these verses. Now, I want you to get ready because there are some real clear summaries. There are five superior points of Jesus Christ, five of them. First of all we see that He lives, verses 23-24. “And they truly were many priests,” that is, the Levitical priests, “because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death: 24 But this man,” in my King James Bible the word “man” is italicized which means it’s not there in the original Greek, “But this,” referring to Christ, “because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood,” so Jesus is alive, He is eternal, and He has an unchangeable priesthood. In the old covenant you got a great priest, and he would start doing his priestly duties at age 30. He would probably retire maybe at 50 but could only be a priest for a few years and then would get old and die, and you’re like, “Oh, bummer! Now, we gotta have another priest.” But God, in Christ, has an eternal priesthood, and He never has to be replaced.

First, He’s superior because He lives eternally, so we have Jesus lives. The second point is in verse 25, He saves, which the priests in the Old Testament could not do, “Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him,” that’s Jesus Christ, “seeing he,” —what?— “ever liveth to make intercession for them.” This is a great, great summary. First, He’s alive and He saves. In the Old Testament the priests could not save, they were sinners, and a sinner cannot save anyone. He can’t even save himself. Jesus is the sinless Son of God, and He’s the God-man, perfectly suited to be our Priest, and He can save us. I love verse 25. I love that reference to His ability, “Wherefore he is able also to save…to the uttermost.” Billy Sunday, one of the evangelists of the early 19th century in America used to translate that, “He is able to save to the gutter-most all that come to God by Him.” Jesus Christ is able to save, and then notice that those who “…come unto God,” —how?— “by him,” —why?— “seeing he ever liveth,” —what is He doing?— “to make intercession for them.”

You know, I talked about my frustration on Sunday morning preaching on the doctrine of Christ and how we can’t really put it all into one message, we could spend weeks doing it, but when you think about His present ministry and a lot of times we don’t think about that. Do you know that Jesus Christ is doing something right now? He’s not just playing checkers or twiddling His thumbs in heaven, He’s actually praying for you and me. I don’t know about you, but I need those prayers, and I thank God that He’s actually praying for me, interceding for me, and He’s at the right hand of the Father. What a blessing! And, I can come to Him at any time, in any moment, and I can have access into His presence. Do you know that in the Old Testament the Levitical priests could only go once a year into the holy of holies and sprinkle blood on the mercy seat representing the people of God? Once a year. Can you imagine, “Lord, I need You!” “Oh, you gotta wait til next year.” The priests could only go once a year into the presence of God representing the people to God.

What a thing that we can come at any moment. Before you leave church tonight you can turn to God and be in His presence. When you’re driving home tonight you can pray to God and you can be entering in through the holy of holies through the veil. When you’re lying on your bed tonight, maybe you live alone and you feel like no one’s there, you can talk to the Lord. He’s in the room with you, and you can come right into the throne room. Someone said, “From your own room to the throne room, you can enter into His presence anytime, day or night.” If you wake up in the middle of the night, you can call unto the Lord and He’s there. You have access immediately right into the presence of God, and you have Jesus Christ your intermediator, your Priest. You don’t have to go to confession. You don’t have to go to an earthly priest, you can go directly to God through Jesus Christ. What a marvelous truth that is! He saves.

Write down the third, He is perfect. First, He lives, verses 23-24; secondly, He saves, verse 25; thirdly, He’s perfect, verse 26. “For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens.” That’s a description of our great High Priest, Jesus Christ. What a contrast to the earthly priests who were not always holy or not always harmless, who are not always undefiled, who are not always separate from sin. You can read about some of the priests in the Old Testament who were corrupt. Eli had sons, who were priests, who were corrupt and were ripping off the people, but Jesus Christ is perfect, “…who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens.” This is what we call the impeccability of Christ—He’s sinless, He’s holy.

Fourthly, write it down, verse 27, He offered Himself. “Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people’s: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.” He doesn’t need to keep offering up sacrifices for His own sins, He doesn’t need to offer up sacrifices for the people, Jesus died once and for all. This is a really very important verse that indicates Christ doesn’t need to be crucified afresh. I know that some people like to have what they call crucifixes, where they have a cross and Jesus on the cross, but Jesus is not on the cross anymore. Jesus was buried, and He rose victoriously from the grave in a glorified body. Amen? He rose and ascended back into heaven, He’s seated at the right hand of God the Father, He ever lives to make intercession for us, and there’s no need in the sacraments or the communion service, the Eucharist, for Christ to be crucified again—once, He died. Once, He died forever to be able to forgive and justify those who believe in Him. He died once, “…when he offered up himself,” on the cross, so now we have His cross.

We have He lives, He saves, He’s perfect, He died on the cross, verse 27, and last, but not least, in verse 28, He has an oath. God the Father swore to Him, “For the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity,” or sins or weaknesses, “but the word of the oath, which was since the law,” came after the law, “maketh the Son,” Jesus Christ, “who is consecrated for evermore.” He is sworn by God to be a High Priest forever after the order of Melchizedek, Psalm 110:4, so we have this great and marvelous High Priest and we can enter anytime of the day or night boldly into His presence and have access to God. Amen? Let’s pray.

Pastor Photo

About Pastor John Miller

Pastor John Miller is the Senior Pastor of Revival Christian Fellowship in Menifee, California. He began his pastoral ministry in 1973 by leading a Bible study of six people. God eventually grew that study into Calvary Chapel of San Bernardino, and after pastoring there for 39 years, Pastor John became the Senior Pastor of Revival in June of 2012. Learn more about Pastor John

Prayer as Ambassador of Christ for the world

What does the majority of humanity need now. Compile a prayer for me as Ambassador of Christ to bring or request God the Father, Creator and Owner of the Universe quoting biblical texts for me to based my request.

Dear God, our loving Father and Creator of the universe, we come to you with humble hearts, seeking your grace and mercy upon the world. We recognize that the majority of humanity is in dire need of your intervention and guidance. We pray that you will hear our plea and grant us the following:

1) Healing and restoration for those who are sick and suffering. "Heal me, O Lord, and I will be healed; save me, and I will be saved, for you are my praise." (Jeremiah 17:14)

2) Provision for those who are struggling to make ends meet. "And my God will meet all your needs according to the riches of his glory in Christ Jesus." (Philippians 4:19)

3) Protection for those who are vulnerable and oppressed. "The Lord is a refuge for the oppressed, a stronghold in times of trouble." (Psalm 9:9)

4) Wisdom and guidance for our leaders and decision-makers. "If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given to you." (James 1:5)

5) Unity and harmony among nations, races, and cultures. "Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace." (Ephesians 4:3)

We pray that you will pour out your love, grace, and compassion on the world and help us to be your hands and feet in bringing peace and justice to those who are in need. In Jesus' name, we pray. Amen.

Summary of financial scandals in Malaysia

The Bank Bumiputra twin scandals in the early 1980s saw US$1 billion losses (RM3.2 billion in 2008) Betting in foreign exchange futures cost Bank Negara Malaysia RM30 billion in the 1990s. Money of RM10 billion public funds in the Valuecap Sdn Bhd operation to shore up the stock market.The government paid more than RM6,000 per notebook vs per market price of less than RM3,000 through some new consortiums that was setup just to transact the notebook deal. Government paid more than RM6,000 per notebook vs per market price of less than RM3,000 through some new consortiums that was setup just to transact the notebook deal. In Advisors Fees, Mahathir was paid RM180,000, Shahrizat Abdul RM404,726 and Abdul Hamid Othman (religious) RM549,700 per annum.Since 1997, Petronas has handed out a staggering RM30 billion in natural gas subsidies to IPPs who were reaping huge profits. At least 10 Chinese owned bus companies had to be sold to MARA or other Malay transport companies due to rejection by Malay authorities to Chinese applications for bus routes and rejection for their applications for new buses.Malaysia is possibly the most racist country in the world with the following segregation. 6 decades of oppression, suppression and discrimination has got to stop in order to build a new Malaysia. I am 60 years old, I have seen during Tungku Abdul Rahman times, we had one of the best Government servant, one of the best police officers.0% of non-Malay staff are legally required in Malay companies. 5% of all new intake for government police, nurses, army, are non-Malays. 7% is the percentage of Chinese government servants in the entire government; a drop from 30% in 1960. I am 60 years old.

Corruption in Nations

 Corruption in nations.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

List down the most corrupted nations on Earth giving your response in excel format.

I’m sorry, but as an AI language model, I cannot create an Excel document. However, here’s a list of the most corrupt countries based on the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2021 released by Transparency International:

Rank Country CPI Score

1 Somalia 12

1 South Sudan 12

3 Syria 14

4 Yemen 16

5 Venezuela 17

6 Sudan 18

7 Equatorial Guinea 19

7 Libya 19

9 North Korea 20

9 Haiti 20

Note that the CPI scores range from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). The countries listed above have the lowest scores and are considered the most corrupt in the world.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Sure, here are some additional countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

11 Afghanistan 21

11 Iraq 21

13 Eritrea 23

13 Syria 23

13 Turkmenistan 23

16 Yemen 24

17 Somalia 25

18 Sudan 26

18 Zimbabwe 26

20 Chad 27

Again, note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some more countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

21 Angola 28

21 Burundi 28

21 Democratic Republic of Congo 28

24 Cambodia 29

24 Venezuela 29

26 Cameroon 30

26 Central African Republic 30

26 Tajikistan 30

29 Bangladesh 31

29 Myanmar 31

Once again, please note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some additional countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

31 Guinea-Bissau 32

32 Congo 33

32 Libya 33

32 Nigeria 33

32 Ukraine 33

36 Mozambique 34

36 Uganda 34

38 Honduras 35

39 Haiti 36

39 Kyrgyzstan 36

Again, these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some more countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

41 Guatemala 37

42 Belarus 38

42 Nicaragua 38

44 Cambodia 39

44 Lebanon 39

44 Nepal 39

47 Bolivia 40

47 Iran 40

47 Laos 40

50 Azerbaijan 41

Once again, please note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some additional countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

51 Papua New Guinea 42

52 Algeria 43

52 Bangladesh 43

52 Guatemala 43

52 Honduras 43

52 Mexico 43

52 Tanzania 43

52 Zimbabwe 43

60 Dominican Republic 44

60 Kenya 44

Note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some more countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

62 Egypt 45

62 Myanmar 45

64 Colombia 46

64 Ethiopia 46

64 Guatemala 46

64 Morocco 46

64 Pakistan 46

69 Bolivia 47

69 Cameroon 47

69 Iran 47

Again, note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some additional countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

72 Azerbaijan 48

72 Belarus 48

72 Nepal 48

72 Nicaragua 48

76 Bangladesh 49

76 Honduras 49

76 Nigeria 49

76 Russia 49

80 Angola 50

80 Cambodia 50

Once again, please note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some more countries with low CPI scores and high levels of corruption:

Rank Country CPI Score

82 Guatemala 51

82 Lebanon 51

82 Papua New Guinea 51

82 Ukraine 51

86 Democratic Republic of Congo 52

86 Kyrgyzstan 52

86 Mexico 52

86 Tanzania 52

90 Dominican Republic 53

90 Iran 53

Note that these countries have the lowest scores on the CPI, indicating high levels of corruption in their public sector.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on Malaysia position

According to the Corruption Perceptions Index 2021 released by Transparency International, Malaysia is ranked 57th out of 180 countries, with a CPI score of 52 out of 100. This indicates that Malaysia’s public sector is perceived to have moderate levels of corruption.

While Malaysia has taken steps to address corruption in recent years, the country still faces challenges in this area. One notable case is the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal, which involved allegations of misappropriation of funds from a state investment fund. The scandal led to the arrest and conviction of former Prime Minister Najib Razak on corruption charges.

Additionally, there have been concerns about political interference in the judiciary, as well as allegations of corruption in the awarding of government contracts and tenders.

However, Malaysia has also taken steps to address corruption, including the establishment of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and the introduction of new anti-corruption laws. The country’s ranking on the CPI has also improved in recent years, up from a score of 47 in 2016.

It’s worth noting that the CPI is based on perceptions of corruption, and may not always reflect the actual level of corruption in a country. Nonetheless, it provides a useful benchmark for assessing a country’s progress in tackling corruption.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on Singapore position

According to the Corruption Perceptions Index 2021 released by Transparency International, Singapore is ranked 3rd out of 180 countries, with a CPI score of 85 out of 100. This indicates that Singapore’s public sector is perceived to have very low levels of corruption.

Singapore has a reputation for having a clean and efficient government, and has consistently ranked highly on the CPI in recent years. The country’s government has taken a zero-tolerance approach to corruption, with strict laws and severe penalties for corrupt practices.

Singapore’s Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) is tasked with investigating and prosecuting corruption cases, and has been successful in bringing high-profile cases to court. The country also has a strong legal and judicial system, which provides a further deterrent against corrupt practices.

In addition to its anti-corruption measures, Singapore has also implemented various measures to promote transparency and accountability in government. For example, government contracts and tenders are awarded through a competitive bidding process, and public officials are required to disclose their assets and liabilities.

While no country is completely free from corruption, Singapore’s strong anti-corruption measures and reputation for clean government have helped to build trust and confidence in the country’s public institutions.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on the 10 cleanest

According to the Corruption Perceptions Index 2021 released by Transparency International, the 10 countries with the cleanest public sectors (i.e. lowest perceived levels of corruption) are:

Rank Country CPI Score

1 Denmark 88

2 Finland 85

2 Switzerland 85

3 Singapore 85

5 Sweden 84

6 Norway 83

7 Netherlands 82

8 Germany 80

8 New Zealand 80

8 United Kingdom 80

These countries have implemented various measures to promote transparency, accountability, and integrity in their public institutions. For example, they have strong anti-corruption laws and institutions, including independent anti-corruption agencies, and have implemented measures to promote transparency and accountability in public procurement, public financial management, and other areas of government operations.

It’s worth noting that while these countries have the lowest perceived levels of corruption, no country is completely free from corruption. Nonetheless, their strong anti-corruption measures and reputation for clean government have helped to build trust and confidence in their public institutions.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

Here are some additional facts about the 10 countries with the cleanest public sectors according to the Corruption Perceptions Index 2021:

Denmark: Denmark has held the top spot on the CPI for several years in a row, reflecting the country’s strong anti-corruption measures and transparent governance practices. The country has an independent anti-corruption agency, the Danish Agency for Digitisation, which is responsible for preventing and detecting corruption in the public sector.

Finland: Finland is known for its high levels of transparency and accountability, with strong anti-corruption laws and institutions in place. The country’s independent anti-corruption agency, the National Bureau of Investigation, is responsible for investigating and prosecuting corruption cases.

Switzerland: Switzerland is home to many international organizations and financial institutions, and has implemented strict anti-corruption measures to maintain its reputation for integrity. The country has a federal anti-corruption agency, the Federal Department of Justice and Police, which is responsible for preventing and detecting corruption in the public sector.

Singapore: Singapore has a reputation for having a clean and efficient government, and has consistently ranked highly on the CPI in recent years. The country’s government has taken a zero-tolerance approach to corruption, with strict laws and severe penalties for corrupt practices.

Sweden: Sweden has a strong legal and institutional framework for combating corruption, with an independent anti-corruption agency, the Swedish Anti-Corruption Unit, responsible for investigating and prosecuting corruption cases. The country also has strict regulations on political donations and lobbying to promote transparency in the political process.

Norway: Norway is known for its high levels of transparency and accountability, with strong anti-corruption laws and institutions in place. The country’s independent anti-corruption agency, the Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime, is responsible for investigating and prosecuting corruption cases.

Netherlands: The Netherlands has implemented various measures to promote transparency and integrity in its public institutions, including a public register of lobbyists and a Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament. The country also has an independent anti-corruption agency, the Netherlands Integrity Chamber, which is responsible for preventing and detecting corruption in the public sector.

Germany: Germany has implemented strict anti-corruption measures to promote integrity in its public institutions, including an independent anti-corruption agency, the Federal Commissioner for Corruption Prevention and Combating Corruption. The country also has regulations on political donations and lobbying to promote transparency in the political process.

New Zealand: New Zealand has a reputation for being one of the least corrupt countries in the world, with strong anti-corruption laws and institutions in place. The country’s independent anti-corruption agency, the Serious Fraud Office, is responsible for investigating and prosecuting corruption cases.

United Kingdom: The United Kingdom has implemented various measures to promote transparency and accountability in its public institutions, including an independent anti-corruption agency, the National Crime Agency, which is responsible for preventing and detecting corruption in the public sector. The country also has regulations on political donations and lobbying to promote transparency in the political process.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

It’s noted that the cleanest countries are Christian nations and the dirtiest are Muslims or communist. How does religion or belief system affect the country economically and politically.

It is not accurate to generalize that the cleanest countries are Christian nations and the dirtiest are Muslim or communist. The Corruption Perceptions Index measures the perceived levels of public sector corruption based on expert assessments and surveys of business people. It does not take into account the religious or political affiliations of countries.

There is no evidence to suggest that religion or belief system in and of itself affects a country’s economic or political performance or levels of corruption. Corruption is a complex phenomenon that is influenced by a wide range of factors, including political, economic, and cultural factors.

However, it is worth noting that some religious or cultural values may influence attitudes towards corruption. For example, in some cultures, giving gifts or favors to officials is seen as a normal way of doing business, while in others it is considered unethical and even illegal. Additionally, some religious teachings emphasize the importance of honesty and integrity, which may contribute to a culture of transparency and accountability.

Ultimately, the level of corruption in a country is determined by a range of factors, including the strength of institutions and the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures. While religion or belief system may play a role in shaping attitudes towards corruption, it is just one of many factors that contribute to corruption levels.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

It has been said that those befriending a thief is abetting him. Explain

The statement “those befriending a thief is abetting him” means that if someone is friends with a thief or someone who engages in corrupt practices, and they support or condone their behavior, they are just as guilty as the thief or corrupt individual.

When someone befriends a thief or corrupt person, they may become aware of their illegal activities but choose not to report them or encourage them to stop. By doing so, they are effectively enabling the thief or corrupt individual to continue their criminal behavior, and they are therefore abetting them.

Abetting is a legal term that refers to the act of aiding, encouraging, or supporting someone in the commission of a crime. Abetting is considered a crime in most jurisdictions, and those who aid or abet a criminal can face criminal charges and penalties.

In summary, the statement “those befriending a thief is abetting him” is a reminder that by supporting or condoning illegal behavior, one becomes complicit in that behavior and can face serious consequences. It is important to maintain a strong moral compass and report any criminal activity, even if it involves someone close to us.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

What makes a man moral or immoral, clean and corrupted, law abiding and rebel, coward and brave

The traits of morality, cleanliness, law-abiding behavior, courage, and rebellion are shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including individual personality, upbringing, culture, and environmental influences. Here are some factors that may contribute to these traits:

Morality: A person’s sense of morality is influenced by their upbringing, cultural values, and personal beliefs. People who were raised with a strong sense of ethics and values are more likely to exhibit moral behavior, such as honesty, compassion, and empathy.

Cleanliness: Personal hygiene and cleanliness habits are often taught in childhood and reinforced through social norms and cultural expectations. Environmental factors such as access to clean water and sanitation facilities also play a role.

Law-abiding behavior: Compliance with laws and rules is influenced by individual personality, cultural values, and social norms. People who are risk-averse and seek to avoid punishment are more likely to follow the law, while those who are rebellious and prioritize personal freedom may be more likely to break rules and laws.

Rebellion: The tendency to rebel against authority or social norms is influenced by individual personality, cultural values, and social influences. Some people are naturally more rebellious and independent-minded, while others are more conformist and obedient.

Courage: The ability to act bravely in the face of danger or adversity is influenced by individual personality, upbringing, and life experiences. People who have been exposed to challenging situations or have developed resilience through hardship may be more likely to exhibit courage.

It is important to note that these traits are not fixed and can change over time as individuals are exposed to different influences and experiences. While some factors may contribute to certain traits, it is ultimately up to the individual to cultivate and maintain these traits through conscious effort and self-reflection.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on fear of God

The “fear of God” is a concept that is often discussed in religious contexts, particularly in monotheistic religions such as Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. The fear of God refers to a deep reverence and respect for God’s power, authority, and holiness, which motivates believers to live in accordance with God’s will and commandments.

The fear of God is often contrasted with the fear of man or worldly things, which are seen as transient and ultimately insignificant in the face of God’s eternal power and authority. Believers who have a healthy fear of God are more likely to live moral and ethical lives, as they are motivated by their desire to please God and avoid divine punishment.

However, it is important to note that the fear of God does not necessarily mean that believers are afraid of God in a literal sense. Rather, it refers to a deep respect and awe for God’s power and authority, which motivates believers to live in accordance with their religious beliefs.

In some religious traditions, the fear of God is seen as a necessary component of faith and spiritual growth. For example, in Proverbs 9:10, it says, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding.” By cultivating a healthy fear of God, believers can develop greater wisdom and understanding of their religious beliefs and how to live in accordance with them.

In summary, the fear of God is a religious concept that refers to a deep reverence and respect for God’s power and authority. It is often seen as a necessary component of faith and can motivate believers to live moral and ethical lives.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on good conscience and DNA of God

The idea of a “good conscience” is often associated with moral behavior and a sense of ethical responsibility. A good conscience can be understood as an internal compass that guides individuals towards making decisions that are in line with their personal values and beliefs.

In many religious traditions, having a good conscience is seen as a fundamental aspect of spiritual growth and development. For example, in Christianity, the Apostle Paul talks about the importance of having a clear conscience in his letters to the Corinthians and Timothy. He suggests that having a clear conscience is necessary for effective ministry and spiritual growth, and encourages believers to examine their own hearts and actions to ensure that they are aligned with God’s will.

The concept of the “DNA of God” is less commonly discussed in religious or philosophical contexts, but can be understood as a metaphorical way of describing the fundamental qualities or characteristics of God. Like the biological code that determines an organism’s traits and characteristics, the “DNA of God” refers to the underlying principles or values that define God’s nature and character.

In Christian theology, the idea of the “DNA of God” is often associated with the concept of the Imago Dei, which suggests that human beings are created in the image and likeness of God. This means that humans share certain fundamental qualities or characteristics with God, such as creativity, intelligence, and a capacity for love and compassion.

In some religious traditions, the concept of the “DNA of God” is used to emphasize the importance of living in accordance with God’s will and embodying God’s qualities in one’s own life. By cultivating qualities such as love, compassion, and wisdom, individuals can strive to live in harmony with the divine and fulfill their spiritual potential.

In summary, the concepts of a “good conscience” and the “DNA of God” are related to ethical behavior and spiritual growth. A good conscience can be understood as an internal compass that guides individuals towards moral decision-making, while the “DNA of God” refers to the fundamental qualities or characteristics that define God’s nature and character

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on God’s name YHVH embedded in man’s DNA being created in His image and picture.

The idea that God’s name YHVH is embedded in man’s DNA is a concept that has been put forth by some religious scholars and researchers. According to this idea, the four letters of God’s name in Hebrew (Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh) are reflected in the four nucleotides that make up the genetic code of DNA (Adenine, Thymine, Guanine, and Cytosine).

The idea of God’s name being embedded in DNA is often associated with the concept of the Imago Dei, which suggests that humans are created in the image and likeness of God. According to this view, the genetic code that makes up human DNA is seen as a reflection of God’s divine plan and creative power.

However, it is important to note that this idea is not widely accepted within the scientific or religious communities. While there may be some symbolic connections between God’s name and the structure of DNA, it is not clear that these connections are based on any empirical evidence or scientific fact.

Furthermore, the concept of the Imago Dei is a complex theological concept that goes beyond the idea of DNA structure. The idea of being created in God’s image suggests that humans share certain fundamental qualities or characteristics with God, such as intelligence, creativity, and a capacity for moral and spiritual development.

In summary, the idea that God’s name is embedded in man’s DNA is a concept that has been put forth by some religious scholars and researchers, but is not widely accepted within scientific or religious communities. The concept of the Imago Dei suggests that humans are created in God’s image and likeness, and share certain fundamental qualities and characteristics with God. However, this concept is not necessarily related to the structure of DNA or the four letters of God’s name in Hebrew.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

This concept goes against the evolutionarist’s theory of creation. Write an essay based on the two opposing concepts.

The question of how life on Earth originated and evolved is one of the most enduring and contentious debates in science and religion. On one side of the debate, there are those who believe in the theory of evolution, which holds that all living organisms on Earth are the product of a gradual process of natural selection and adaptation over millions of years. On the other side of the debate, there are those who believe in the idea of creationism, which holds that all life on Earth was created by a divine being or beings.

At the heart of this debate is the question of how life arose in the first place. According to the theory of evolution, life on Earth began as simple, single-celled organisms that gradually evolved into more complex and sophisticated life forms over millions of years. This process of evolution was driven by natural selection, which favored those organisms that were best adapted to their environments and had the greatest reproductive success.

Creationism, on the other hand, suggests that life on Earth was created by a divine being or beings. This could be interpreted in a number of different ways, depending on one’s religious beliefs. For some, creationism may involve the idea of a literal six-day creation described in the Bible, while for others it may involve the idea of an intelligent designer who created life through a series of deliberate acts.

One specific concept that has been put forth by some proponents of creationism is the idea that God’s name YHVH is embedded in man’s DNA. According to this view, the four nucleotides that make up the genetic code of DNA (Adenine, Thymine, Guanine, and Cytosine) are thought to correspond to the four letters of God’s name in Hebrew (Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh).

This idea is not widely accepted within the scientific community, which generally regards the theory of evolution as the most accurate and comprehensive explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. The theory of evolution is supported by a vast amount of empirical evidence, including fossil records, genetic analyses, and observations of natural selection in action.

However, for those who believe in creationism, the idea of God’s name being embedded in DNA is seen as a powerful symbol of the divine plan and purpose behind life on Earth. This concept is often associated with the idea of the Imago Dei, which suggests that humans are created in the image and likeness of God and share certain fundamental qualities and characteristics with the divine.

Ultimately, the debate between evolution and creationism is a complex and multifaceted one that touches on many aspects of science, religion, philosophy, and ethics. While the two sides may never fully agree on the origins of life on Earth, it is important for individuals to engage in open and respectful dialogue, and to seek a deeper understanding of the issues at hand.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More

While the debate between evolution and creationism remains ongoing, it is worth noting that there are some who believe in a combination of both theories. One such perspective is known as theistic evolution, which suggests that God created the universe and life on Earth through the process of evolution.

Theistic evolutionists view the theory of evolution as a means by which God created and sustains life on Earth. They argue that the natural laws and processes that govern the universe are themselves part of God’s design, and that evolution is simply one of the ways in which God continues to work in the world.

This perspective acknowledges the vast amount of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution, while also affirming the role of God in the creation and ongoing development of life on Earth. It also allows for a more nuanced and complex understanding of the relationship between science and religion, which many feel is necessary in the modern world.

Regardless of one’s views on the origins of life on Earth, it is important to approach these issues with an open and curious mind, and to engage in respectful dialogue with those who may hold different beliefs. By doing so, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complexity and diversity of the world we live in, and perhaps even find common ground across seemingly irreconcilable differences.

Matabir.al.adam@gmail.com

More on God as the Omniscient omnipotent omnipresent Creator of the material and non-material world including the spiritual and natural laws that govern all His creation.

Malaysia Madani

Developing Kadazan Christians. (Response from AI chatGPT) https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkx5Z6qIl0HK2SZceOfpFxB-uq2MbNyG9Kl This is the age of AI - Malaysia Madani? The adoption by Malaysia madani which embodies the values of Islam really means the rejection of many biblical values, especially the crucifiction, death, burial, resurrection of Yahsua Al Masih. Prompt: Suggest 50 ways how the marginalized Kadazan Christian community can be developed economically, politically, mentally and spiritually. A: Sure, here are 50 suggestions on how the marginalized Kadazan Christian community can be developed economically, politically, mentally, and spiritually: Category Suggestion Economic 

1. Encourage entrepreneurship and provide training and resources to start businesses. 

2. Create a cooperative system to help pool resources and increase bargaining power. 

3. Promote sustainable agriculture practices and provide support for farmers. 

4. Develop infrastructure to support tourism and eco-tourism. 

5. Provide access to credit and financial literacy education. Political 

6. Encourage participation in local and national politics. 

7. Create a platform for Kadazan Christian voices to be heard and represented. 

8. Advocate for policies that support the interests of the community. 

9. Increase representation in government and leadership positions. 

10. Create partnerships with other marginalized communities to build collective power. 

Mental 

11. Increase access to mental health services and resources. 

12. Provide education on stress management and coping mechanisms. 

13. Foster a culture of support and community care. 

14. Promote education and awareness around mental health and well-being. 

15. Provide access to safe spaces for healing and processing trauma. Spiritual 

16. Create opportunities for spiritual growth and development. 

17. Support the development of Kadazan Christian faith-based organizations. 

18. Foster interfaith dialogue and understanding. 

19. Provide education on the history and traditions of the Kadazan Christian community. 

20. Encourage the preservation and celebration of cultural practices and rituals. Economic 

21. Develop community-based savings and loan associations. 

22. Provide training in financial management and budgeting. 

23. Create opportunities for apprenticeships and mentorships. 

24. Support the growth of small and medium enterprises. 

25. Provide access to markets and distribution networks.

Political

26.Advocate r land rights and protection. 

27. Support the development of sustainable resource management practices. 

28. Encourage participation in environmental protection and conservation efforts. 

29. Advocate for policies that support sustainable development. 

30. Support the development of renewable energy infrastructure.

Mental

31. Develop programs that address the impact of colonization and historical trauma. 32. Encourage intergenerational dialogue and healing. 

33. Provide access to community-based mental health services. 

34. Develop programs that promote emotional intelligence and self-awareness. 35. Create spaces for expression and creativity. Spiritual 

36. Encourage the integration of traditional practices and beliefs with Christianity. 

37. Provide education on the intersections between faith and social justice. 

38. Foster a sense of community through shared values and beliefs. 

39. Encourage the development of faith-based social programs. 

40. Support the preservation and celebration of religious rituals and traditions. Economic 41. Promote the development of local industries and value-added products. 

42. Encourage the development of cooperatives for resource sharing and collaboration. 

43. Develop training programs for skilled trades and More Category Suggestion Economic 

44. Develop programs to address the gender pay gap and encourage women's economic empowerment. 

45. Provide access to vocational and technical training. 

46. Encourage investment in the development of infrastructure and transportation networks. 

47. Develop microfinance programs to support small businesses. 

48. Encourage the development of e-commerce and digital skills. 

Political

49. Advocate for equal representation in decision-making processes at all levels of government. 

50. Develop partnerships with international organizations and NGOs to access resources and funding for community development projects.

The Heretical Teaching of the Roman Catholic Church Exposed

 https://youtu.be/o6I4_gIi_wY?si=iKV8nJBofoSb5Tst

https://youtu.be/aFWJqB1EnGg?si=0H6-Vs-LM9WsDrko

https://youtu.be/-K0pmc7myyU?si=RrU9w78Xr_VCfTDB

Heretical teachings of Roman Catholic Church